How UHPC outperforms traditional materials

See how Ultra-High Performance Concrete compares to Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) and traditional precast concrete across key performance metrics.

Panel Design Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of a typical facade panel across three material systems.

Traditional Precast Concrete

Traditional Precast Concrete

Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete

Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete

Ultra High Performance Concrete

Ultra High Performance Concrete

Concrete Type
C40
C40
UHPC
Thickness
100 mm
15 mm
25 mm
Weight
600 kg
90 kg
150 kg
Volume
0.24 m³
0.036 m³
0.06 m³
Rate
$120/m²
$200/m²
$180/m²
Reinforcement
Steel mesh
Glass fibers
Steel fibers

Compressive Strength

Maximum load a material can bear under compression before failure.

Compressive strength comparison chart

Flexural Strength

Resistance to bending and cracking under load.

Flexural strength comparison chart

Density

Mass per unit volume of the material.

Density comparison chart

Lifespan

Expected service life under normal conditions.

Lifespan comparison chart

UHPC - ASTM C1609

UHPC demonstrates strain-hardening behavior after first crack, maintaining load-carrying capacity well beyond the initial cracking point.

Chart 1 Mobile

GFRC - BS EN 1170-5

GFRC shows moderate post-crack behavior with gradual strain softening after peak load.

Chart 2 Desktop

Traditional Precast - ASTM C78

Traditional precast concrete exhibits brittle failure with rapid load drop after first crack.

Chart 3 Desktop

Explore more

Learn More

Why UHPC

Explore

Customization

Discover

R&D

Ready to use UHPC in your next project?